Im an architecture student from Welllington NZ. I am currently researching on an essay topic which is as folows:
The rhetoric around the digital architecture frames it as the new, as distinct and as a new way of thinking about architecture. It is often framed as being distinct from previous ways of thinking in architecture. Digital is being framed as a paradigm shift. What relationship does digital have with architectures past and its present? And what does it mean that the digital’s aim is for continual instability and change without the mark of the designer? Or is it just another style? Refer to the workings of a contemporary digital architect to support your position.
If you have any comments on this, references i should look at or any advice would be appreciated
Hi there
Im an architecture student from Welllington NZ. I am currently researching on an essay topic which is as folows:
The rhetoric around the digital architecture frames it as the new, as distinct and as a new way of thinking about architecture. It is often framed as being distinct from previous ways of thinking in architecture. Digital is being framed as a paradigm shift. What relationship does digital have with architectures past and its present? And what does it mean that the digital’s aim is for continual instability and change without the mark of the designer? Or is it just another style? Refer to the workings of a contemporary digital architect to support your position.
If you have any comments on this, references i should look at or any advice would be appreciated
regds
Hi Ankit,
You can have a look at these references:
http://www.proofresearch.net/references?mini=calendar/2008/9/all&
There are some really good resources out there.
Best
thank you for your assistance and help..much appreciated. If something comes up related to my research please don’t hesitate to contact me.
regds
Ankit